Corrections & Retractions

The Journal of Intelligent Computing and Connected Systems (JICCS) is committed to maintaining the accuracy and integrity of the scholarly record. When significant errors or concerns are identified in a published article, the journal may take appropriate action to correct or, where necessary, retract the publication.

1. Purpose

Corrections and retractions are used to maintain the accuracy, reliability, and transparency of the published scholarly record.

The appropriate action depends on the nature and significance of the issue identified.

2. Corrections

A correction may be considered when an error in a published article affects the accuracy or clarity of the work but does not invalidate the overall research findings or conclusions.

Examples may include:

  • Errors in text or formatting.
  • Incorrect author or affiliation information.
  • Errors in figures or tables.
  • Minor errors in data presentation.
  • Other factual or production errors that require clarification.

The journal will assess the significance of the error before deciding whether a correction is appropriate.

3. Retractions

A published article may be considered for retraction when there is substantial evidence that the reliability or integrity of the publication has been seriously compromised.

Possible reasons may include:

  • Significant fabrication or falsification of data.
  • Serious plagiarism or inappropriate duplication.
  • Major errors that invalidate the findings or conclusions.
  • Unethical research practices.
  • Serious undisclosed conflicts of interest that materially affect the work.
  • Duplicate publication.
  • Other circumstances that substantially undermine the integrity of the published article.

Retraction does not necessarily imply misconduct by every author. The circumstances and evidence will be considered individually.

4. Retraction Process

When a serious concern is identified, the editorial team may:

  1. Review the concern and available evidence.
  2. Contact the authors for clarification where appropriate.
  3. Request supporting information or documentation.
  4. Consult relevant experts or institutions when necessary.
  5. Assess whether correction, retraction, or another action is appropriate.
  6. Communicate the editorial decision to the relevant parties.

The process may vary depending on the nature and complexity of the concern.

5. Retraction Notice

When an article is retracted, the journal may publish a retraction notice explaining the reason for the action.

The notice should provide sufficient information to distinguish the retracted article from other publications and maintain transparency for readers.

Where technically possible, the original article and its bibliographic information will remain part of the scholarly record with a clear indication of its retracted status.

6. Corrections After Publication

Authors who identify a significant error in their published article should promptly contact the editorial team.

The request should include:

  • Article title.
  • Author information.
  • Description of the error.
  • Correct information.
  • Explanation of how the correction affects the article, if applicable.

The editorial team will assess the requested correction and determine the appropriate action.

7. Reader Concerns

Readers who identify a potential error or ethical concern in a published article may contact the journal.

A concern should include sufficient information to allow the editorial team to identify and assess the relevant article and issue.

The journal may request additional information where necessary.

8. Author Responsibilities

Authors are expected to:

  • Inform the journal promptly if they discover a significant error in their published work.
  • Cooperate with reasonable editorial investigations.
  • Provide accurate information and supporting documentation when requested.
  • Participate appropriately in correction or retraction procedures.

9. Editorial Responsibility

The editorial team is responsible for assessing concerns relating to published articles and determining appropriate action.

Decisions should be based on the available evidence and the applicable editorial and publication-ethics policies.

The journal aims to handle correction and retraction matters fairly, transparently, and consistently.

10. Post-Publication Changes

Changes to a published article will be considered carefully because maintaining the integrity of the published scholarly record is important.

Where a change is necessary, the journal will aim to ensure that the nature of the change is transparent to readers.

11. Appeals

Authors may raise concerns about a correction or retraction decision through the journal's applicable appeals procedure.

Further information is provided in the Appeals & Complaints policy.

12. Commitment to the Scholarly Record

JICCS recognizes that maintaining an accurate and trustworthy scholarly record is a continuing responsibility.

The journal will consider appropriate corrections, notices, or retractions when credible evidence demonstrates that action is necessary to protect the integrity of published research.